
doi: 10.1093/bja/69.6.647
pmid: 1467114
Extradural abscess has been described infrequently as a complication of extradural anaesthesia and analgesia. We describe an abscess that developed 5 days after operation in a patient who had extradural anaesthesia for Caesarean section and postoperative analgesia, and review the literature on extradural abscess complicating extradural catheterization, including a discussion on pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management. There have now been 16 reported cases of extradural catheter-related extradural abscess. Only one previous case has been in obstetric practice, despite the widespread use of these techniques in this specialty. A disproportionate number of cases have involved thoracic catheters. Duration of catheterization ranged from 40 h to 6 weeks, the majority of catheters being in place for 5 days or less. The time from catheter placement to development of symptoms ranged from 72 h to 5 months. The causative organism was isolated in 11 cases: Staphylococcus aureus was identified in nine (82%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis in two (18%). Outcome was reported in 15 cases, of which seven (47%) had a full or near full recovery and eight (53%) had a persistent neurological deficit. One case was managed successfully without surgery. Fifty percent of all cases have been reported in the past 5 years. With the increasing use of extradural techniques for anaesthesia and analgesia, this serious complication may be seen more frequently in the future.
Adult, Anesthesia, Epidural, Epidural Space, Cesarean Section, Staphylococcal Infections, Abscess, Postoperative Complications, Pregnancy, Anesthesia, Obstetrical, Humans, Female
Adult, Anesthesia, Epidural, Epidural Space, Cesarean Section, Staphylococcal Infections, Abscess, Postoperative Complications, Pregnancy, Anesthesia, Obstetrical, Humans, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 119 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
