
doi: 10.1093/bja/63.4.453
pmid: 2818924
In a laboratory model, humidity output was investigated in relation to the design of a circle absorber system. A 70-kg subject was simulated with fresh gas flows of 0.5, 2 or 5 litre min-1. Different circle systems, absorption canisters and tubings were studied. It was found that both the type of circle system (according to Eger's classification) and the size of the absorption canister, influenced the humidity of inspired gases. Coaxial tubing only moderately increased the humidity. If a fresh gas flow of 0.5 liter min-1 was used, optimum moisture contents were attained, irrespective of the circle system tested. Low fresh gas flows, a small canister and an Eger A type circle system, were factors which increased humidification.
Evaluation Studies as Topic, Anesthesia, Closed-Circuit, Humans, Humidity, Anesthesia, Inhalation, Absorption
Evaluation Studies as Topic, Anesthesia, Closed-Circuit, Humans, Humidity, Anesthesia, Inhalation, Absorption
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
