Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ British Journal of A...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Article
License: Elsevier Non-Commercial
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Article . 1972 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier Non-Commercial
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

THE VARIABILITY OF PARTITION COEFFICIENTS FOR HALOTHANE IN THE RABBIT

Authors: W W, Mapleson; P R, Allott; A, Steward;

THE VARIABILITY OF PARTITION COEFFICIENTS FOR HALOTHANE IN THE RABBIT

Abstract

SUMMARY Partition coefficients were determined for halothane in various rabbit tissues after about five hours anaesthesia. After correcting for the fall in haematocrit which occurred during the experiments the mean blood/gas coefficient was 3.94. Except in the case of skeletal muscle the tissue/blood coefficients differed significantly from unity: brain 1.55, heart 2.74, kidney 1.75 and liver 2.26. The differences between the tissues were highly significant. Differences between animals were large but mainly unsystematic. The 95% confidence limits for tissue/gas coefficients in the population were +32% —24%. There was also variation between individual 1- to 2-ml samples of the same tissue: the 95% confidence limits for such samples were of the order of +20% of the mean for liver, and +50% of the mean for heart, kidney and muscle.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Analysis of Variance, Muscles, Myocardium, Brain, Kidney, Hematocrit, Liver, Solubility, Organ Specificity, Animals, Rabbits, Anesthesia, Inhalation, Halothane

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
hybrid