
Abstract Motivation Methods based on summary statistics obtained from genome-wide association studies have gained considerable interest in genetics due to the computational cost and privacy advantages they present. Imputing missing summary statistics has therefore become a key procedure in many bioinformatics pipelines, but available solutions may rely on additional knowledge about the populations used in the original study and, as a result, may not always ensure feasibility or high accuracy of the imputation procedure. Results We present ARDISS, a method to impute missing summary statistics in mixed-ethnicity cohorts through Gaussian Process Regression and automatic relevance determination. ARDISS is trained on an external reference panel and does not require information about allele frequencies of genotypes from the original study. Our method approximates the original GWAS population by a combination of samples from a reference panel relying exclusively on the summary statistics and without any external information. ARDISS successfully reconstructs the original composition of mixed-ethnicity cohorts and outperforms alternative solutions in terms of speed and imputation accuracy both for heterogeneous and homogeneous datasets. Availability and implementation The proposed method is available at https://github.com/BorgwardtLab/ARDISS. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Cohort Studies, Gene Frequency, Genotype, Ethnicity, Eccb 2018: European Conference on Computational Biology Proceedings, Humans, Software, Genome-Wide Association Study
Cohort Studies, Gene Frequency, Genotype, Ethnicity, Eccb 2018: European Conference on Computational Biology Proceedings, Humans, Software, Genome-Wide Association Study
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
