
pmid: 28169394
Abstract Motivation Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) has enabled studying structural genomic variants (SVs) such as duplications and inversions in large cohorts. SVs have been shown to play important roles in multiple diseases, including cancer. As costs for NGS continue to decline and variant databases become ever more complete, the relevance of genotyping also SVs from NGS data increases steadily, which is in stark contrast to the lack of tools to do so. Results We introduce a novel statistical approach, called DIGTYPER (Duplication and Inversion GenoTYPER), which computes genotype likelihoods for a given inversion or duplication and reports the maximum likelihood genotype. In contrast to purely coverage-based approaches, DIGTYPER uses breakpoint-spanning read pairs as well as split alignments for genotyping, enabling typing also of small events. We tested our approach on simulated and on real data and compared the genotype predictions to those made by DELLY, which discovers SVs and computes genotypes, and SVTyper, a genotyping program used to genotype variants detected by LUMPY. DIGTYPER compares favorable especially for duplications (of all lengths) and for shorter inversions (up to 300 bp). In contrast to DELLY, our approach can genotype SVs from data bases without having to rediscover them. Availability and Implementation https://bitbucket.org/jana_ebler/digtyper.git. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Genotype, Genotyping Techniques, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Chromosome Duplication, Chromosome Inversion, Genomic Structural Variation, Humans, Databases, Nucleic Acid, Software, Sequence Deletion
Genotype, Genotyping Techniques, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Chromosome Duplication, Chromosome Inversion, Genomic Structural Variation, Humans, Databases, Nucleic Acid, Software, Sequence Deletion
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
