
pmid: 18487240
AbstractMotivation: Low haplotype diversity and linkage disequilibrium are the rule in short genomic segments. This fact suggests that parsimony should be enforced in estimation of haplotype frequencies. The current article introduces a diversity penalty that automatically discards potential haplotypes with low explanatory power. The standard EM algorithm for haplotype frequency estimation can accommodate the penalty if one passes over to a more general minorize–maximize (MM) scheme for estimation.Results: Our new MM algorithm converges in fewer iterations, eliminates marginal haplotypes from further consideration and reduces the computational complexity of each iteration. Estimation by the MM algorithm also improves haplotyping and genotype imputation compared to naive application of the EM algorithm. Thus, the MM algorithm is a useful substitute for the EM algorithm. Compared to the most sophisticated current methods of haplotyping and genotype imputation, the MM algorithm is slightly less accurate but at least an order of magnitude faster.Availability: Our software will be made available in the next release the program Mendel at http://www.genetics.ucla.edu/software/.Contact: kayers@ucla.edu
Male, Chromosomes, Human, X, Models, Statistical, Genotype, Computational Biology, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Theoretical, Linkage Disequilibrium, Gene Frequency, Haplotypes, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Databases, Genetic, Humans, Algorithms, Software
Male, Chromosomes, Human, X, Models, Statistical, Genotype, Computational Biology, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Theoretical, Linkage Disequilibrium, Gene Frequency, Haplotypes, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Databases, Genetic, Humans, Algorithms, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
