
Abstract Motivation: The classification of proteins into homologous groups (families) allows their structure and function to be analysed and compared in an evolutionary context. The modular nature of eukaryotic proteins presents a considerable challenge to the delineation of families, as different local regions within a single protein may share common ancestry with distinct, even mutually exclusive, sets of homologs, thereby creating an intricate web of homologous relationships if full-length sequences are taken as the unit of evolution. We attempt to disentangle this web by developing a fully automated pipeline to delineate protein subsequences that represent sensible units for homology inference, and clustering them into putatively homologous families using the Markov clustering algorithm. Results: Using six eukaryotic proteomes as input, we clustered 162 349 protein sequences into 19 697–77 415 subsequence families depending on granularity of clustering. We validated these Markov clusters of homologous subsequences (MACHOS) against the manually curated Pfam domain families, using a quality measure to assess overlap. Our subsequence families correspond well to known domain families and achieve higher quality scores than do groups generated by fully automated domain family classification methods. We illustrate our approach by analysis of a group of proteins that contains the glutamyl/glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase domain, and conclude that our method can produce high-coverage decomposition of protein sequence space into precise homologous families in a way that takes the modularity of eukaryotic proteins into account. This approach allows for a fine-scale examination of evolutionary histories of proteins encoded in eukaryotic genomes. Contact: m.ragan@imb.uq.edu.au Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. MACHOS for the six proteomes are available as FASTA-formatted files: http://research1t.imb.uq.edu.au/ragan/machos
Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Proteome, Statistics & Probability, Molecular Sequence Data, 069999 Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified, Biochemical Research Methods, C1, Ismb 2008 Conference Proceedings 19–23 July 2008, Toronto, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Cluster Analysis, Interdisciplinary Applications, Computer Simulation, Amino Acid Sequence, Models, Statistical, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, 006, Markov Chains, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology, Models, Chemical, Computer Science, 970106 Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciences, Mathematical & Computational Biology, Sequence Alignment, Mathematics, Algorithms
Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Proteome, Statistics & Probability, Molecular Sequence Data, 069999 Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified, Biochemical Research Methods, C1, Ismb 2008 Conference Proceedings 19–23 July 2008, Toronto, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Cluster Analysis, Interdisciplinary Applications, Computer Simulation, Amino Acid Sequence, Models, Statistical, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, 006, Markov Chains, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology, Models, Chemical, Computer Science, 970106 Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciences, Mathematical & Computational Biology, Sequence Alignment, Mathematics, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
