
pmid: 16267090
Abstract Motivation: A classification algorithm, based on a multi-chip, multi-SNP approach is proposed for Affymetrix SNP arrays. Current procedures for calling genotypes on SNP arrays process all the features associated with one chip and one SNP at a time. Using a large training sample where the genotype labels are known, we develop a supervised learning algorithm to obtain more accurate classification results on new data. The method we propose, RLMM, is based on a robustly fitted, linear model and uses the Mahalanobis distance for classification. The chip-to-chip non-biological variance is reduced through normalization. This model-based algorithm captures the similarities across genotype groups and probes, as well as across thousands of SNPs for accurate classification. In this paper, we apply RLMM to Affymetrix 100 K SNP array data, present classification results and compare them with genotype calls obtained from the Affymetrix procedure DM, as well as to the publicly available genotype calls from the HapMap project. Availability: The RLMM software is implemented in R and is available from Bioconductor or from the first author at nrabbee@post.harvard.edu. Contact: nrabbee@stat.berkeley.edu Supplementary information:
Models, Statistical, Genotype, Models, Genetic, Gene Expression Profiling, DNA Mutational Analysis, Normal Distribution, Computational Biology, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Alternative Splicing, Gene Frequency, Haplotypes, Humans, Regression Analysis, Algorithms, Alleles, Software, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
Models, Statistical, Genotype, Models, Genetic, Gene Expression Profiling, DNA Mutational Analysis, Normal Distribution, Computational Biology, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Alternative Splicing, Gene Frequency, Haplotypes, Humans, Regression Analysis, Algorithms, Alleles, Software, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 309 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
