
Abstract Motivation The rapid advancement of next-generation sequencing technologies has generated an immense volume of genetic data. However, these data are unevenly distributed, with well-studied organisms being disproportionately represented, while other organisms, such as from archaea, remain significantly underexplored. The study of archaea is particularly challenging due to the extreme environments they inhabit and the difficulties associated with culturing them in the laboratory. Despite these challenges, archaea likely represent a crucial evolutionary link between eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms, and their investigation could shed light on the early stages of life on Earth. Yet, a significant portion of archaeal proteins are annotated with limited or inaccurate information. Among the various classes of archaeal proteins, DNA-binding proteins are of particular importance. While they represent a large portion of every known proteome, their identification in archaea is complicated by the substantial evolutionary divergence between archaeal and the other better studied organisms. Results To address the challenges of identifying DNA-binding proteins in archaea, we developed Xenusia, a neural network-based tool capable of screening entire archaeal proteomes to identify DNA-binding proteins. Xenusia has proven effective across diverse datasets, including metagenomics data, successfully identifying novel DNA-binding proteins, with experimental validation of its predictions. Availability and implementation Xenusia is available as a PyPI package, with source code accessible at https://github.com/grogdrinker/xenusia, and as a Google Colab web server application at xenusia.ipynb.
DNA-Binding Proteins, Original Paper, Proteome, Archaeal Proteins, Computational Biology, Computer Simulation, Neural Networks, Computer, Archaea, Software
DNA-Binding Proteins, Original Paper, Proteome, Archaeal Proteins, Computational Biology, Computer Simulation, Neural Networks, Computer, Archaea, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
