
pmid: 39936571
pmc: PMC11878791
Abstract Motivation Alternative splicing is a tightly regulated biological process, that due to its cell type specific behavior, calls for analysis at the single cell level. However, quantifying differential splicing in scRNA-seq is challenging due to low and uneven coverage. Hereto, we developed ELLIPSIS, a tool for robust quantification of splicing in scRNA-seq that leverages locally observed read coverage with conservation of flow and intra-cell type similarity properties. Additionally, it is also able to quantify splicing in novel splicing events, which is extremely important in cancer cells where lots of novel splicing events occur. Results Application of ELLIPSIS to simulated data proves that our method is able to robustly estimate Percent Spliced In values in simulated data, and allows to reliably detect differential splicing between cell types. Using ELLIPSIS on glioblastoma scRNA-seq data, we identified genes that are differentially spliced between cancer cells in the tumor core and infiltrating cancer cells found in peripheral tissue. These genes showed to play a role in a.o. cell migration and motility, cell projection organization, and neuron projection guidance. Availability and implementation ELLIPSIS quantification tool: https://github.com/MarchalLab/ELLIPSIS.git.
Original Paper, Technology and Engineering, Sequence Analysis, RNA, RNA Splicing, Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis, MECHANISMS, Alternative Splicing, CELLS, Humans, RNA-SEQ, RNA-Seq, Single-Cell Analysis, Glioblastoma, Software, Algorithms
Original Paper, Technology and Engineering, Sequence Analysis, RNA, RNA Splicing, Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis, MECHANISMS, Alternative Splicing, CELLS, Humans, RNA-SEQ, RNA-Seq, Single-Cell Analysis, Glioblastoma, Software, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
