
Abstract Motivation Contrastive learning has been widely used as pretext tasks for self-supervised pre-trained molecular representation learning models in AI-aided drug design and discovery. However, existing methods that generate molecular views by noise-adding operations for contrastive learning may face the semantic inconsistency problem, which leads to false positive pairs and consequently poor prediction performance. Results To address this problem, in this article, we first propose a semantic-invariant view generation method by properly breaking molecular graphs into fragment pairs. Then, we develop a Fragment-based Semantic-Invariant Contrastive Learning (FraSICL) model based on this view generation method for molecular property prediction. The FraSICL model consists of two branches to generate representations of views for contrastive learning, meanwhile a multi-view fusion and an auxiliary similarity loss are introduced to make better use of the information contained in different fragment-pair views. Extensive experiments on various benchmark datasets show that with the least number of pre-training samples, FraSICL can achieve state-of-the-art performance, compared with major existing counterpart models. Availability and implementation The code is publicly available at https://github.com/ZiqiaoZhang/FraSICL.
Models, Molecular, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Original Paper, Biomolecules (q-bio.BM), Semantics, Machine Learning (cs.LG), Quantitative Biology - Biomolecules, FOS: Biological sciences
Models, Molecular, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Original Paper, Biomolecules (q-bio.BM), Semantics, Machine Learning (cs.LG), Quantitative Biology - Biomolecules, FOS: Biological sciences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
