
AbstractSummaryNext-Generation Sequencing is widely used as a tool for identifying and quantifying microorganisms pooled together in either natural or designed samples. However, a prominent obstacle is achieving correct quantification when the pooled microbes are genetically related. In such cases, the outcome mostly depends on the method used for assigning reads to the individual targets. To address this challenge, we have developed Exodus—a reference-based Python algorithm for quantification of genomes, including those that are highly similar, when they are sequenced together in a single mix. To test Exodus’ performance, we generated both empirical and in silico next-generation sequencing data of mixed genomes. When applying Exodus to these data, we observed median error rates varying between 0% and 0.21% as a function of the complexity of the mix. Importantly, no false negatives were recorded, demonstrating that Exodus’ likelihood of missing an existing genome is very low, even if the genome’s relative abundance is low and similar genomes are present in the same mix. Taken together, these data position Exodus as a reliable tool for identifying and quantifying genomes in mixed samples. Exodus is open source and free to use at: https://github.com/ilyavs/exodus.Availability and implementationExodus is implemented in Python within a Snakemake framework. It is available on GitHub alongside a docker containing the required dependencies: https://github.com/ilyavs/exodus. The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Genome, Research Design, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Applications Notes, Software, Algorithms
Genome, Research Design, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Applications Notes, Software, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
