
pmid: 11331238
Abstract Motivation: Almost all methods of chromosome recognition assume supervised training; i.e. we are given correctly classified chromosomes to start the training phase. Noise, if any, is confined only in the representation of the chromosomes and not in the classification of the chromosomes. During the recognition phase, the problem is simply to calculate the string edit distance of the unknowns to the representatives chosen from the training phase and classify the unknowns accordingly. Results: In this paper, a general method to tackle the difficult unsupervised induction problem is described. The success of the method is demonstrated by showing how the inductive agent learns weights in a dynamic manner that allows it to distinguish between noisy median and telocentric chromosomes without knowing their proper labels. The process of learning is characterized as the process of finding the right distance function, i.e. the distance function that can nicely separate the classes. Contact: t-chan@u-aizu.ac.jp
Models, Genetic, Computational Biology, Algorithms, Chromosomes, Pattern Recognition, Automated
Models, Genetic, Computational Biology, Algorithms, Chromosomes, Pattern Recognition, Automated
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
