
doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx097
pmid: 29912290
DNA methylation plays an essential role in cancer. Differential variability (DV) in cancer was recently observed that contributes to cancer heterogeneity and has been shown to be crucial in detecting epigenetic field defects, DNA methylation alterations happening early in carcinogenesis. As neighboring CpG sites are highly correlated, here, we present a new method to detect differentially methylated regions (DMRs) that uses combined signals from differential methylation and DV between sample groups. We demonstrated in simulation studies the superior performance of the new method than existing methods that use only one type of signals when true DMRs have both. Applications to DNA methylation data of breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA) and kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and BRCA from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) suggest that the new method identified additional cancer-related DMRs that were missed by methods using one type of signals. Replication analyses using two independent BRCA data sets suggest that DMRs detected based on DV are reproducible. Only the new method identified epigenetic field defects when comparing normal tissues adjacent to tumors and normal tissues from age-matched cancer-free women from the GEO BRCA data and confirmed their enrichment in the progression to breast cancer.
Analysis of Variance, Computational Biology, Genetic Variation, Breast Neoplasms, DNA, Neoplasm, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA Methylation, Kidney Neoplasms, Epigenesis, Genetic, Case-Control Studies, Databases, Genetic, Humans, Computer Simulation, CpG Islands, Female, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Algorithms
Analysis of Variance, Computational Biology, Genetic Variation, Breast Neoplasms, DNA, Neoplasm, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA Methylation, Kidney Neoplasms, Epigenesis, Genetic, Case-Control Studies, Databases, Genetic, Humans, Computer Simulation, CpG Islands, Female, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
