
doi: 10.1093/bib/bbu001
pmid: 24504770
Short tandem repeats are highly polymorphic and associated with a wide range of phenotypic variation, some of which cause neurodegenerative disease in humans. With advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies, there are novel opportunities to study genetic variation. While available sequencing technologies and bioinformatics tools provide options for mining high-throughput sequencing data, their suitability for analysis of repeat variation is an open question, with tools for quantifying variability in repetitive sequence still in their infancy. We present here a comprehensive survey and empirical evaluation of current sequencing technologies and bioinformatics tools in all stages of an analysis pipeline. While there is not one optimal pipeline to suit all circumstances, we find that the choice of alignment and repeat genotyping tools greatly impacts the accuracy and efficiency by which short tandem repeat variation can be detected. We further note that to detect variation relevant to many repeat diseases, it is essential to choose technologies that offer either long read-lengths or paired-end sequencing, coupled with specific genotyping tools.
Bioinformatics tools, High-throughput sequencing, Computational Biology, Genetic Variation, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, 1710 Information Systems, Short tandemrepeat variation, Sequence alignment, Variant calling, 1312 Molecular Biology, Humans, Sequence Alignment, Microsatellite Repeats
Bioinformatics tools, High-throughput sequencing, Computational Biology, Genetic Variation, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, 1710 Information Systems, Short tandemrepeat variation, Sequence alignment, Variant calling, 1312 Molecular Biology, Humans, Sequence Alignment, Microsatellite Repeats
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
