
doi: 10.1093/bib/bbac533
pmid: 36545795
Abstract Drug–target binding affinity prediction is a fundamental task for drug discovery and has been studied for decades. Most methods follow the canonical paradigm that processes the inputs of the protein (target) and the ligand (drug) separately and then combines them together. In this study we demonstrate, surprisingly, that a model is able to achieve even superior performance without access to any protein-sequence-related information. Instead, a protein is characterized completely by the ligands that it interacts. Specifically, we treat different proteins separately, which are jointly trained in a multi-head manner, so as to learn a robust and universal representation of ligands that is generalizable across proteins. Empirical evidences show that the novel paradigm outperforms its competitive sequence-based counterpart, with the Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 0.4261 versus 0.7612 and the R-Square of 0.7984 versus 0.6570 compared with DeepAffinity. We also investigate the transfer learning scenario where unseen proteins are encountered after the initial training, and the cross-dataset evaluation for prospective studies. The results reveals the robustness of the proposed model in generalizing to unseen proteins as well as in predicting future data. Source codes and data are available at https://github.com/huzqatpku/SAM-DTA.
Proteins, Prospective Studies, Amino Acid Sequence, Ligands, Software, Protein Binding
Proteins, Prospective Studies, Amino Acid Sequence, Ligands, Software, Protein Binding
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
