
doi: 10.1093/bib/6.1.57
pmid: 15826357
The volume of published biomedical research, and therefore the underlying biomedical knowledge base, is expanding at an increasing rate. Among the tools that can aid researchers in coping with this information overload are text mining and knowledge extraction. Significant progress has been made in applying text mining to named entity recognition, text classification, terminology extraction, relationship extraction and hypothesis generation. Several research groups are constructing integrated flexible text-mining systems intended for multiple uses. The major challenge of biomedical text mining over the next 5-10 years is to make these systems useful to biomedical researchers. This will require enhanced access to full text, better understanding of the feature space of biomedical literature, better methods for measuring the usefulness of systems to users, and continued cooperation with the biomedical research community to ensure that their needs are addressed.
PubMed, Biomedical Research, Abstracting and Indexing, Information Storage and Retrieval, Documentation, Databases, Bibliographic, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Semantics, Vocabulary, Controlled, Database Management Systems, Periodicals as Topic, Algorithms, Natural Language Processing
PubMed, Biomedical Research, Abstracting and Indexing, Information Storage and Retrieval, Documentation, Databases, Bibliographic, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Semantics, Vocabulary, Controlled, Database Management Systems, Periodicals as Topic, Algorithms, Natural Language Processing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 528 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
