
doi: 10.1093/bib/1.4.381
pmid: 11465055
An important computational technique for extracting the wealth of information hidden in human genomic sequence data is to compare the sequence with that from the corresponding region of the mouse genome, looking for segments that are conserved over evolutionary time. Moreover, the approach generalises to comparison of sequences from any two related species. The underlying rationale (which is abundantly confirmed by observation) is that a random mutation in a functional region is usually deleterious to the organism, and hence unlikely to become fixed in the population, whereas mutations in a non-functional region are free to accumulate over time. The potential value of this approach is so attractive that the public and private projects to sequence the human genome are now turning to sequencing the mouse, and you will soon be able to compare the human and mouse sequences of your favourite genomic region. We are currently witnessing an explosion of computer tools for comparative analysis of two genomic sequences. Here the capabilities of two new network servers for comparing genomic sequences from any pair of closely related species are sketched. The Syntenic Gene Prediction Program SGP-I utilises sequence comparisons to enhance the ability to locate protein coding segments in genomic data. PipMaker attempts to determine all conserved genomic regions, regardless of their function.
Genome, Interleukin-13, Genome, Human, Computational Biology, Genomics, Evolution, Molecular, Mice, Animals, Humans, Interleukin-4, Sequence Alignment, Conserved Sequence, Software
Genome, Interleukin-13, Genome, Human, Computational Biology, Genomics, Evolution, Molecular, Mice, Animals, Humans, Interleukin-4, Sequence Alignment, Conserved Sequence, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
