
Abstract Pearl millet and finger millet face challenges in adopting transgenic or editing approaches due to their inherent recalcitrance to genetic transformation protocols. To overcome these limitations, the current study aims to streamline the genetic transformation protocol for pearl millet and finger millet. We targeted mature embryos as explants to assess transformation efficiencies, gain in time, and overall feasibility. Notably, a transformation efficiency of 17.74% and 18.79%, for pearl millet and finger millet, respectively, was observed using a method that involved directly piercing the mature seeds at the embryonic region with a needle dipped in Agrobacterium suspension, followed by vacuum infiltration. After infection, the seeds were allowed to produce calli and differentiate into shoots and roots, resulting in the development of PCR-positive plants. The induction of infected explants to form calli and subsequent differentiation into shoots and roots, leading to putatively transformed plants, was achieved within 60–66 days. Chi-square analysis of hygromycin selection in T1 progeny showed a 3:1 segregation, indicating single-locus inheritance, and PCR of T1 plants with Cas9 and HptII primers confirmed intact T-DNA transmission. Furthermore, as a proof-of-concept for transformation leading to gene editing, a grain-specific phospholipase-d delta1 (PgPLD-delta1-7a), previously identified in our study, was successfully targeted in pearl millet using the CRISPR/Cas9 approach. This seed-piercing protocol has been successfully evaluated in two genotypes of pearl millet and one genotype of finger millet, resulting in the generation of putative-transformed plants.
Studies
Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
