Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Annals of Botanyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Annals of Botany
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

On the geography of big plant genera

Authors: Ludwig Baldaszti; Tiina Särkinen; Neil Brummitt; Domingos Cardoso; Sandra Knapp; Débora Zuanny; Peter W Moonlight;

On the geography of big plant genera

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims Fewer than one percent of the World’s plant genera have >500 species, yet these big genera collectively account for >25% of plant species. It remains unclear how these specific big genera achieved their present-day global distributions and if they share characteristics that may have contributed to their success. We examined the distributions of big plant genera to determine: (i) if the diversity patterns of big genera are representative of overall plant diversity patterns; and (ii) if there are groups of big genera with similar geographic distributions that may help explain their success. Methods We mapped the distribution of each flowering plant species at the botanical country scale using data from the World Checklist of Vascular Plants and investigated the proportion of species in big genera in each botanical country across latitudes and climate zones. We used hierarchical clustering to determine whether big genera could be grouped based upon their distributions in botanical countries, aggregated into floristic realms. Key Results Big plant genera are not distributed evenly relative to global flowering plant diversity but are particularly well-represented in continental and polar regions of the Northern Hemisphere. Big plant genera can be grouped into five clusters based upon their shared distributions, each centred around one floristic realm. Individual big genera, however, tend to occur across multiple floristic realms, with >92% occurring in two or more floristic realms and ∼33% occurring across all realms. Conclusions We propose that pre-adaptions, ecological opportunity, long-distance dispersal, and key innovations have played a central role in the geographical evolution of big genera, and contributed to their exceptional size and distribution. Collectively, these factors have resulted in repeated radiations among different clades across big plant genera and have ultimately led to the accumulation of species diversity in these groups.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Top 10%
Average
Average
hybrid
Related to Research communities