
Abstract Background and Aims Dry dehiscent fruits have independently evolved multiple times during angiosperm diversification. A striking example is the convergent evolution of Brassicaceae siliques and Papaveraceae pods, both formed by two fused carpels forming valves that meet at a replum or replum-like structure. In both cases, valve separation occurs through a dehiscence zone at the valve margins in contact with the replum. In Arabidopsis, fruit development is regulated by transcription factors: FRUITFULL (FUL) ensures proper valve cell division, REPLUMLESS (RPL) specifies replum identity and SHATTERPROOF (SHP1/2) genes pattern the dehiscence zone. SHP1/2 also regulate INDEHISCENT (IND) for lignified layer formation and ALCATRAZ (ALC) and SPATULA (SPT) for the non-lignified layer. The network is downregulated by APETALA2 (AP2), which influences replum formation and valve margin growth. Methods Using previously published and new in situ RNA hybridization expression data, we evaluated how this network applies to basal eudicots. Key Results In Bocconia frutescens, homologue expression suggests conserved roles for FUL and AP2 in fruit wall proliferation, acting antagonistically to ALC and RPL homologues localized to the dehiscence zone. A role for STK homologues in dehiscence zone formation cannot be excluded, while a role of AG-like genes, the closest homologues of SHP during fruit development, is unlikely. Conclusions Our findings indicate significant rewiring of the fruit developmental network between basal and core eudicots, underscoring the need for functional studies in non-eudicot species to validate this framework.
Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Papaveraceae, Fruit, Brassicaceae, Research in Context, Plant Proteins, Transcription Factors
Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Papaveraceae, Fruit, Brassicaceae, Research in Context, Plant Proteins, Transcription Factors
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
