The retributive paradox

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Apr 1994 English Publisher:Oxford University Press (OUP)Journal:Analysis, volume 54, pages 72-78 (issn: 0003-2638, eissn: 1467-8284,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Deirdre Golash;

doi: 10.1093/analys/54.2.72 , 10.2307/3328824

The retributive paradox

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

[1] S. L. Hurley, 'Newcomb's Problem, Prisoners' Dilemma, and Collective Action', Synthese 86 (1991) 173-96. [2] David Lewis, 'Prisoners' Dilemma is a Newcomb Problem', Philosophy and Public Affairs 8 (1979) 235-40; reprinted in Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation, edited by Richmond Campbell and Lanning Sowden (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1985). [3] Robert Nozick, 'Newcomb's Problem and Two Principles of Choice', in Essays in Honor of C. G. Hempel, edited by N. Rescher et al. (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1969); reprinted in Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation. [4] Robert Nozick, The Nature of Rationality (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993).

Related Organizations

University of Mary
United States

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	6
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average