Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ American Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
American Journal of Clinical Pathology
Article . 1998 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Are Autopsies Obsolete?

Authors: L, Nichols; P, Aronica; C, Babe;

Are Autopsies Obsolete?

Abstract

To determine the current frequency of discovering important diagnoses at autopsy, the diagnoses made in all complete or "no head" autopsies during 1994 at a major tertiary care transplantation referral center were retrospectively compared with the diagnoses made antemortem. Of 176 autopsies, 79 (44.9%) revealed 1 or more undiagnosed causes of death. Of the 123 undiagnosed causes of death, 13 were sole immediate causes of death, 72 were one of multiple immediate causes, 22 were intervening causes, and 16 were underlying causes. The causes of death were as follows: infections, 34; infarctions, 11; malignant neoplasms, 8; pulmonary emboli, 7; gastrointestinal ulcers, 7; hemorrhages, 6; thromboses, 3; amyloidosis, 1; genetic hemochromatosis, 1; and cardiac tamponade, 1. Of 35 autopsies of transplant recipients, 16 (46%) disclosed undiagnosed causes of death, compared with 63 (44.7%) of 141 autopsies of patients who had not received transplants. Approximately two thirds of the undiagnosed causes of death were judged to be treatable conditions. This and similar studies suggest that old-fashioned low-technology autopsies can uncover many important diagnoses missed by modern high-technology medicine.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Malpractice, Middle Aged, Infections, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Cause of Death, Neoplasms, Humans, Female, Autopsy, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    68
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
68
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
bronze