
pmid: 7424806
The efficacy of cross-sectional fat areas in estimating total body fat was investigated in a sample of white American children and adults. Body density and total fat weight (kg) in the body were determined by hydrostatic weighing. Fat areas were calculated for the arm and calf using the appropriate limb circumferences and skinfolds measured at the triceps, biceps, and calf sites; also, a fat area was calculated using the average of triceps and biceps sites and arm circumference. Cross-sectional fat areas do not estimate body density (and percentage fat) any better than the corresponding skinfolds. In estimating weight of fat in the body, however, fat areas are systematically better estimators than corresponding skinfold thicknesses.
Adult, Male, Aging, Leg, Adolescent, Anthropometry, Middle Aged, Skinfold Thickness, Sex Factors, Adipose Tissue, Arm, Body Constitution, Humans, Female, Child
Adult, Male, Aging, Leg, Adolescent, Anthropometry, Middle Aged, Skinfold Thickness, Sex Factors, Adipose Tissue, Arm, Body Constitution, Humans, Female, Child
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 58 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
