
AbstractAmbedkar conceived representation as an instrument to shift embedded domination to emancipatory possibilities. It must address the conditions of specific societies, and the political and institutional complexes in place, expressed in the memorable metaphor, ‘the coat must fit’. The emerging post-colonial dispensation in India was a matter of special concern. In plural societies, where there is an ethnic majority distinct from the ethnic minority/minorities, if representation is not sensitive to this social fact it may reproduce these very same relations in the political domain, reducing the latter permanently to subservience. Where relations between the majority and minority are open-ended, and there are close bonds between them, there could be joint representation with reservation to the minority, but where they are closed against one another, then the minority deserves separate representation. Ambedkar proposed a scheme of ‘cycles of participation’ to address the Adivasi concerns in India.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
