
pmid: 21675867
Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of discussing retinal findings following nonmydriatic retinal imaging during an endocrinology visit on subsequent HbA1c in poorly controlled diabetic patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR). Materials and Methods: During a visit to an endocrinologist, patients with DR and documented HbA1c ≥8.0% within the preceding month were assigned to either addition of nonmydriatic imaging and discussion of retinal findings or standard endocrinology evaluation alone. Ophthalmology care was otherwise the same in both groups. Changes in HbA1c were evaluated 3 months later. Results: One hundred thirteen (94%) of the original 120 subjects completed the study. The mean HbA1c change in the retinal imaging group was a decline of 1.35%, whereas the control group had a 0.26% increase. Controlling for gender, age, duration of diabetes, presence of hypertension, and use of insulin, the difference between groups was significant ( p <0.0003). Conclusions: Nonmydriatic imaging and discussion of retinal findings during an endocrinologist visit may contribute, at least in the short term, to improved glycemic control in patients with DR and elevated HbA1c.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Glycated Hemoglobin, Male, Diabetic Retinopathy, Middle Aged, Retina, Endocrinology, Photography, Humans, Female, Lebanon, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Glycated Hemoglobin, Male, Diabetic Retinopathy, Middle Aged, Retina, Endocrinology, Photography, Humans, Female, Lebanon, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
