Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Thyroidarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Thyroid
Article . 1999 . Peer-reviewed
License: Mary Ann Liebert TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Thyroid
Article . 1999
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparison of Recombinant Human Thyrotropin Receptors Versus Porcine Thyrotropin Receptors in the Thyrotropin Binding Inhibition Assay for Thyrotropin Receptor Autoantibodies

Authors: A, Kakinuma; I, Morimoto; T, Kuroda; T, Fujihira; S, Eto; S M, McLachlan; B, Rapoport;

Comparison of Recombinant Human Thyrotropin Receptors Versus Porcine Thyrotropin Receptors in the Thyrotropin Binding Inhibition Assay for Thyrotropin Receptor Autoantibodies

Abstract

Thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies (TRAb) are most commonly measured in a thyrotropin-binding inhibition (TBI) assay using solubilized porcine thyrotropin receptors (pTSHR). Recently, we reported modifications in recombinant human thyrotropin receptor (hTSHR) production and extraction that made substitution of this antigen for the pTSHR practical. We now report the first comparison of the behavior in a TBI assay of the recombinant, solubilized hTSHR with the pTSHR in a large series of clinically characterized patients with autoimmune thyroid disease. We studied 227 patients with Graves' disease (32 untreated patients, 156 patients receiving antithyroid medications, 24 patients in remission, 9 patients with recurrence of disease, and 6 thyroidectomized patients), as well as 32 patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis and 28 normal individuals. In patients with untreated Graves' disease, 29 of 32 (90.6%) were TBI positive with either antigen, although two sera gave discrepant data in the two assay. Of the patients receiving antithyroid drugs, 94 of 156 (60.3%) were positive with the pTSHR and 106 of 156 (67.9%) were positive with the hTSHR TBI assay (p < 0.05%). In all other respects, however, there was no difference between the two TBI assays. Neither assay performed well in providing clinical guidance in the remission or relapse of disease. Of the 24 Graves' patients in remission, 75.0% and 79.2% were TBI negative with the hTSHR and pTSHR assays, respectively. The TBI assay at the time of relapse was even less informative; 6 of 9 (66.7%) being TBI negative in the pTSHR assay and 3/9 (33.3%) being negative in the hTSHR assay. In TBI assays with both species of TSHR, 3 of 32 hypothyroid patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis were TBI positive. In summary, production of the recombinant hTSHR is now a practical reality and this antigen can clearly substitute at least as well for the pTSHR in the imperfect, although most commonly used, TBI assay. It is, therefore, likely that the hTSHR will supplant the pTSHR in this important assay. However, the use of the hTSHR rather than pTSHR does not appear to provide a major advantage, at least in terms of TBI assay sensitivity, specificity and predictive value.

Keywords

Immunoassay, Swine, Thyroiditis, Autoimmune, Thyrotropin, Receptors, Thyrotropin, CHO Cells, Binding, Competitive, Graves Disease, Recombinant Proteins, Species Specificity, Case-Control Studies, Cricetinae, Animals, Humans, Autoantibodies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    34
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
34
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!