
pmid: 18544026
In humans, self-endothelialization of synthetic grafts is severely limited, but a recent interesting idea is to attract endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) from peripheral blood onto grafts via antibodies directed at proposed EPC markers. Results with anti-CD34 antibodies have shown some promise, but it is unclear whether CD34 is the best marker for cells with re-endothelializing potential. Much evidence points to kinase insert domain receptor (KDR) as an important indicator of endothelial potential if not a definitive marker. Because KDR is not an adhesion molecule (like CD34), we first demonstrated the ability to use adsorbed and protein G-oriented antibody to this receptor to capture flowing cells onto a solid surface. Using endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells, we show in a model system under low shear rates the ability to selectively capture cells by this receptor. Furthermore, our results indicate that concomitant flow of cells lacking the receptor does not affect the efficiency of capture of KDR(+) cells but that orienting the antibody significantly increases the efficiency of capture.
Blood Platelets, Tissue Engineering, Surface Properties, Myocytes, Smooth Muscle, Antigens, CD34, Thrombosis, Models, Biological, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Transforming Growth Factor beta1, Animals, Humans, Endothelium, Vascular, Cells, Cultured, Papio
Blood Platelets, Tissue Engineering, Surface Properties, Myocytes, Smooth Muscle, Antigens, CD34, Thrombosis, Models, Biological, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Transforming Growth Factor beta1, Animals, Humans, Endothelium, Vascular, Cells, Cultured, Papio
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 63 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
