
doi: 10.1089/sur.2018.194
pmid: 30265592
Bacterial resistance to available antibiotics has resulted in enhanced efforts at antibiotic stewardship but also has led to investigation into alternative methods for managing surgical infections. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are naturally occurring compounds produced by all prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells that have potential as an alternative to conventional antibiotics.The published literature was reviewed for investigations that were relevant to infections commonly seen by surgeons and the potential applicability of AMPs for surgical care.Antimicrobial peptides are low-molecular-weight peptides with activity against bacteria, fungi, and viruses. Experimental evidence shows that AMPs have activity against highly resistant bacteria identified from human infections. Furthermore, these peptides can be designed as semi-synthetic or totally synthetic constructs for potential clinical use. Antimicrobial peptides appear to have in vivo activity in limited animal studies, but the experimental models for evaluation of these peptides need more clinical relevance. These products are in clinical evaluation at present but are limited in number and are being evaluated primarily for topical applications.Antimicrobial peptides have considerable in vitro evidence that supports their use for the prevention and treatment of surgical infections. Better experimental and clinical trial efforts are needed to move this technology toward applicability in surgical care.
Clinical Trials as Topic, Anti-Infective Agents, Administration, Topical, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Animals, Humans, Surgical Wound Infection, Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides
Clinical Trials as Topic, Anti-Infective Agents, Administration, Topical, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Animals, Humans, Surgical Wound Infection, Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 81 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
