
Abstract Background: Various approaches for thyroid surgery became possible with the use of robotic systems. Transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) is one of the newest approaches and draws attention because of its cosmetic excellence. In this study, we compared the surgical outcomes of TORT and conventional open thyroidectomy (OT). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed and compared the medical records of consecutive patients who underwent TORT or OT for thyroid carcinoma from April 2016 to March 2017. Results: The study included 205 patients who underwent TORT ( n = 100) or OT ( n = 105). Mean tumor size was 0.9 cm in both groups. The two groups showed similar surgical outcomes, except for a longer operative time for TORT. Conclusions: TORT could be performed safely and had comparable surgical outcomes with OT in the selected patients. TORT may be considered a suitable operative alternative for patients who do not want to leave scars on the neck.
Adult, Male, Operative Time, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Robotic Surgical Procedures, Thyroid Cancer, Papillary, Adenocarcinoma, Follicular, Thyroidectomy, Humans, Female, thyroid carcinoma; thyroid nodule; thyroidectomy; transoral robotic thyroidectomy; transoral thyroidectomy, Thyroid Neoplasms, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Male, Operative Time, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Robotic Surgical Procedures, Thyroid Cancer, Papillary, Adenocarcinoma, Follicular, Thyroidectomy, Humans, Female, thyroid carcinoma; thyroid nodule; thyroidectomy; transoral robotic thyroidectomy; transoral thyroidectomy, Thyroid Neoplasms, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 44 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
