Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Human Gene Therapyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Human Gene Therapy
Article
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Other literature type . 2020
Data sources: PubMed Central
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Human Gene Therapy
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: Mary Ann Liebert TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Chorioallantoic Membrane Tumor Model for Evaluating Oncolytic Viruses

Authors: Krutzke, Lea; Allmendinger, Ellen; Hirt, Katja; Kochanek, Stefan;

Chorioallantoic Membrane Tumor Model for Evaluating Oncolytic Viruses

Abstract

Oncolytic viruses are promising anticancer agents; however, regarding their clinical efficacy, there is still significant scope for improvement. Preclinical in vivo evaluation of oncolytic viruses is mainly based on syngeneic or xenograft tumor models in mice, which is labor-intensive and time-consuming. Currently, a large proportion of developmental work in the research field of oncolytic viruses is directed toward overcoming cellular and noncellular barriers to achieve improved virus delivery to primary tumors and metastases. To evaluate the large number of genetically or chemically modified viruses regarding tumor delivery and biodistribution patterns, it would be valuable to have an in vivo model available that would allow easy screening experiments, that is of higher complexity than monoclonal cell lines, and that could be used as a platform method before confirmatory studies in small and large animals. Based on our data, we believe that the chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay is a quick and low-cost high-throughput tumor model system for the in vivo analysis of oncolytic viruses. Here we describe the establishment, careful characterization, and optimization of the CAM model as an in vivo model for the evaluation of oncolytic viruses. We have used human adenovirus type 5 (HAdV-5) as an example for validation but are confident that the model can be used as a test system for replicating viruses of many different virus families. We show that the CAM tumor model enables intratumoral and intravenous virus administration and is a feasible and conclusive model for the analysis of relevant virus-host interactions, biodistribution patterns, and tumor-targeting profiles.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Oncolytic Virotherapy, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Lung Neoplasms, Genetic Vectors, Mice, Nude, Genetic Therapy, Virus Replication, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Chorioallantoic Membrane, Adenoviridae, Mice, Mice, Inbred NOD, Animals, Humans, Chickens, Research Articles

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    15
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
15
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Green
hybrid