Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Endourolo...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Endourology
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: Mary Ann Liebert TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Tandem Ureteral Stents for Malignant Ureteral Obstruction

Authors: Miki, Haifler; Asaf, Shvero; Dorit, Zilberman; Jacob, Ramon; Harry, Winkler; David, Margel; Nir, Kleinmann;

Tandem Ureteral Stents for Malignant Ureteral Obstruction

Abstract

Objectives: Malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) is a devastating complication of cancer, and it is commonly treated by drainage via percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN). The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy, safety, and functional outcome of tandem ureteral stents (TUS) in the management of MUO. Materials and Methods: The medical records of all patients with MUO who underwent balloon dilation and TUS insertion in Sheba Medical Center between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Safety was measured by intra- and postoperative complications, efficacy by time to event analysis, and failure by the requirement of PCN attributable to renal failure or infection. Independent risk predictors of TUS failure were determined by a multivariable Cox regression analysis. Results: A total of 103 procedures were performed on 81 patients during the study period. The median follow-up was 32 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 24-67). Fifty-nine (72.9%) patients remained with TUS while 22 patients required PCNs. The median time to procedural failure was 4 months (IQR 2-8). Complications developed after 18 (22.2%) procedures. Two patients requested stent removal due to lower urinary tract symptoms. Independent predictors for TUS failure were metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27, 7.23, p = 0.013) and prior PCN (HR 3.38, 95% CI 1.40, 8.13, p = 0.007). Conclusions: TUS is an efficient and safe management option for patients with MUO. It can alleviate renal failure without the need for an external PCN. Metastasis and prior PCN are associated with TUS failure.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Risk, Ureteral Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Humans, Female, Stents, Postoperative Period, Neoplasm Metastasis, Ureter, Aged, Nephrostomy, Percutaneous, Proportional Hazards Models, Retrospective Studies, Ureteral Obstruction

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!