Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Endourolo...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Endourology
Article . 1999 . Peer-reviewed
License: Mary Ann Liebert TDM
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in the Pediatric Population*

Authors: Demirkesen, Oktay; Tansu, Nejat; Yaycio?lu, Özgür; Onal, Bulent; Yalçın, Veli; Solok, Vural;

Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in the Pediatric Population*

Abstract

Shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is being used increasingly as a therapeutic modality for childhood urolithiasis. We reported our experience and results of SWL in the pediatric population.The 59 renal units (RU) of 54 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The mean patient age was 10+/-3.5 years. All patients were treated with the Lithostar lithotripter in outpatient settings. Those with positive culture results were treated under appropriate antibiotic coverage. Seven patients were treated under general anesthesia and the rest under sedoanalgesia. Shielding of the lung fields or gonads was not used. For the upper pole stones, protection of the lungs was accomplished by elevating the upper half of the body with supportive pillows, thus moving the kidney away from the lung fields. Six RUs were catheterized via double-pigtail ureteral catheters or by percutaneous nephrostomy tube prior to treatment. The average stone load was 1.8+/-2.5 cm2.Patients were treated with an average of 2.5 sessions. A total of 1000 to 2500 shockwaves were delivered between 14.5 and 17.8 kV. Routine spasmolytic treatment was not initiated. The stone-free rate was 64%, and clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) were present in 29% of RUs; thus, the success rate was 93%. Fever that necessitated hospitalization occurred in one patient. No other complications were seen except skin bruising and early hematuria.Shockwave lithotripsy is a safe and effective treatment modality for childhood stones of appropriate size and radiologic characteristics.

Country
Turkey
Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, extracorporeal lithotripsy, pediatrics, male, Risk Factors, Lithotripsy, ureter catheter, Humans, human, contusion, Child, device, Retrospective Studies, fever, child, urolithiasis, patient positioning, general anesthesia, major clinical study, hematuria, female, Treatment Outcome, priority journal, sedation, adolescent, Child, Preschool, outpatient, Urinary Tract Infections, percutaneous nephrostomy, Female, Urinary Calculi, hospitalization

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    48
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
48
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!