
pmid: 31260328
Abstract Topologically associating domains (TADs) are the most fundamental elements and significant structures of the eukaryotic genome. Currently, algorithms have been developed to find the TADs. But few algorithms are reported to compare the similarity of TADs between genomes. In this study, mice Hi-C sequencing data of four contrasts were enrolled. Seventeen algorithms, including BPscore, Jaccard index (JI) distance, VI distance, image hash, image subtraction, image variance, and so on, were used to quantify the genomic similarity of TADs. Image subtraction, Euclidean distance, and Manhattan distance were significantly better for TAD difference detection than the others. Deferent Hash (dHash) with the best zoom size ranked the second, followed by improved Hamming distance algorithm and JI distance. Advantages and disadvantages of various algorithms for quantifying the similarity of TADs were compared. Our work could provide the fundament for TADs comparison.
Mice, Genome, Molecular Conformation, Animals, Eukaryota, Genomics, Algorithms, Chromatin
Mice, Genome, Molecular Conformation, Animals, Eukaryota, Genomics, Algorithms, Chromatin
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
