
Objective: We aimed to (1) examine differences in observed visual attention and motor activity, as well as comprehension of a science video between children with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and (2) explore if psychostimulant medication improves ADHD behaviors and comprehension of a science video in children with ADHD. Method: Children aged 7-11 with (n = 91) and without (n = 45) ADHD watched a science video and then completed a comprehension test. Then, children with ADHD began a 4-week within-subject, randomized, double-blind crossover trial of methylphenidate (MPH). At post-testing, children were randomized to receive placebo or their optimal dosage, watched another science film, and completed a comprehension test. Results: Children with ADHD exhibited higher rates of motor activity during, and worse comprehension of material discussed within, the science video. Mediation models revealed that increased motor activity suppressed between-group differences in comprehension. MPH improved comprehension and visual attention, but not motor activity during the science video. Conclusion: Children with ADHD may benefit from MPH to improve comprehension of and sustained attention during audiovisually presented learning material.
Male, Teaching Materials, Video Recording, Psychological Techniques, Motor Activity, Treatment Outcome, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Humans, Attention, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Female, Child, Comprehension
Male, Teaching Materials, Video Recording, Psychological Techniques, Motor Activity, Treatment Outcome, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Humans, Attention, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Female, Child, Comprehension
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
