
pmid: 26177254
pmc: PMC4652193
arXiv: 1505.03560
handle: 20.500.11824/273 , 1854/LU-6884531 , 11586/144200
pmid: 26177254
pmc: PMC4652193
arXiv: 1505.03560
handle: 20.500.11824/273 , 1854/LU-6884531 , 11586/144200
The resting brain dynamics self-organizes into a finite number of correlated patterns known as resting state networks (RSNs). It is well known that techniques like independent component analysis can separate the brain activity at rest to provide such RSNs, but the specific pattern of interaction between RSNs is not yet fully understood. To this aim, we propose here a novel method to compute the information flow (IF) between different RSNs from resting state magnetic resonance imaging. After haemodynamic response function blind deconvolution of all voxel signals, and under the hypothesis that RSNs define regions of interest, our method first uses principal component analysis to reduce dimensionality in each RSN to next compute IF (estimated here in terms of Transfer Entropy) between the different RSNs by systematically increasing k (the number of principal components used in the calculation). When k = 1, this method is equivalent to computing IF using the average of all voxel activities in each RSN. For k greater than one our method calculates the k-multivariate IF between the different RSNs. We find that the average IF among RSNs is dimension-dependent, increasing from k =1 (i.e., the average voxels activity) up to a maximum occurring at k =5 to finally decay to zero for k greater than 10. This suggests that a small number of components (close to 5) is sufficient to describe the IF pattern between RSNs. Our method - addressing differences in IF between RSNs for any generic data - can be used for group comparison in health or disease. To illustrate this, we have calculated the interRSNs IF in a dataset of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) to find that the most significant differences between AD and controls occurred for k =2, in addition to AD showing increased IF w.r.t. controls.
47 pages, 5 figures, 4 tables, 3 supplementary figures. Accepted for publication in Brain Connectivity in its current form
Male, multivariate Granger causality, Rest, Social Sciences, FOS: Physical sciences, Quantitative Biology - Quantitative Methods, Alzheimer Disease, Medicine and Health Sciences, Humans, resting state networks, resting state, Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM), Aged, Brain Mapping, Principal Component Analysis, fMRI, Brain, Alzheimer's disease, functional magnetic resonance imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, independent component analysi, independent component analysis, networks, Quantitative Biology - Neurons and Cognition, Physics - Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability, FOS: Biological sciences, Multivariate Analysis, Female, Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC), Nerve Net, Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an)
Male, multivariate Granger causality, Rest, Social Sciences, FOS: Physical sciences, Quantitative Biology - Quantitative Methods, Alzheimer Disease, Medicine and Health Sciences, Humans, resting state networks, resting state, Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM), Aged, Brain Mapping, Principal Component Analysis, fMRI, Brain, Alzheimer's disease, functional magnetic resonance imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, independent component analysi, independent component analysis, networks, Quantitative Biology - Neurons and Cognition, Physics - Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability, FOS: Biological sciences, Multivariate Analysis, Female, Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC), Nerve Net, Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
