
We have continued the development of Lagrangian, cosmological perturbation theory for the low-order correlators of the matter density field. We provide a new route to understanding how the effective field theory (EFT) of large-scale structure can be formulated in the Lagrandian framework and a new resummation scheme, comparing our results to earlier work and to a series of high-resolution N-body simulations in both Fourier and configuration space. The `new' terms arising from EFT serve to tame the dependence of perturbation theory on small-scale physics and improve agreement with simulations (though with an additional free parameter). We find that all of our models fare well on scales larger than about two to three times the non-linear scale, but fail as the non-linear scale is approached. This is slightly less reach than has been seen previously. At low redshift the Lagrangian model fares as well as EFT in its Eulerian formulation, but at higher $z$ the Eulerian EFT fits the data to smaller scales than resummed, Lagrangian EFT. All the perturbative models fare better than linear theory.
19 pages, 3 figures
baryon acoustic oscillations, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO), Molecular, FOS: Physical sciences, cosmological parameters from LSS, power spectrum, Atomic, Nuclear & Particles Physics, Particle and Plasma Physics, astro-ph.CO, Nuclear, redshift surveys, Astronomical and Space Sciences, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
baryon acoustic oscillations, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO), Molecular, FOS: Physical sciences, cosmological parameters from LSS, power spectrum, Atomic, Nuclear & Particles Physics, Particle and Plasma Physics, astro-ph.CO, Nuclear, redshift surveys, Astronomical and Space Sciences, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 135 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
