<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
The Ashtekar-Barbero formulation of general relativity admits a one-parameter family of canonical transformations that preserves the expressions of the Gauss and diffeomorphism constraints. The loop quantization of the connection formalism based on each of these canonical sets leads to different predictions. This phenomenon is called the Immirzi ambiguity. It has been recently argued that this ambiguity could be generalized to the extent of a spatially dependent function, instead of a parameter. This would ruin the predictability of loop quantum gravity. We prove that such expectations are not realized, so that the Immirzi ambiguity introduces exclusively a freedom in the choice of a real number.
7 pages, accepted for publication in Classical and Quantum Gravity
FOS: Physical sciences, Immirzi ambiguity, Einstein's equations (general structure, canonical formalism, Cauchy problems), General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc), Quantization of the gravitational field, quantum general relativity, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, canonical transformations
FOS: Physical sciences, Immirzi ambiguity, Einstein's equations (general structure, canonical formalism, Cauchy problems), General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc), Quantization of the gravitational field, quantum general relativity, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, canonical transformations
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |