
Two procedures for obtaining (extracting and constructing) the topological signature of any multiply connected Robertson-Walker (RW) universe are presented. It is shown through computer-aided simulations that both approaches give rise to the same topological signature for a multiply connected flat RW universe. The strength of these approaches is illustrated by extracting the topological signatures of a flat ($k=0$), an elliptic ($k=1$), and a hyperbolic ($k=-1$) multiply connected RW universes. We also show how separated contributions of the covering isometries add up to form the topological signature of a RW flat universe. There emerges from our theoretical results and simulations that the topological signature arises (in the mean) even when there are just a few images for each object. It is also shown that the mean pair separation histogram technique works, and that it is a suitable approach for studying the topological signatures of RW universes as well as the role of non-translational isometries.
27 pages, 7 figures, LaTeX2e. Inserted: clarifying details, a connection with CCP method, new references. To appear in Class. Quantum Grav. (2001) in the present form
High Energy Physics - Theory, Astrophysics (astro-ph), FOS: Physical sciences, topological signature, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc), Astrophysics, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, histogram technique, High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th), covering isometries, Applications of global differential geometry to the sciences, Relativistic cosmology, Robertson-Walker universe
High Energy Physics - Theory, Astrophysics (astro-ph), FOS: Physical sciences, topological signature, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc), Astrophysics, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, histogram technique, High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th), covering isometries, Applications of global differential geometry to the sciences, Relativistic cosmology, Robertson-Walker universe
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
