
A letter by R.B. Mazers et al. (see ibid., vol.28, no.6, p.747-8, 1983) is commented on. That letter commented on a scientific note by the authors (see ibid., vol.27, p.1515-21, 1982) in which the authors stated that there were intra-laboratory differences between cross-sectional studies of vertebral bone mineral content in normal women as measured by dual-photon absorptiometry. The authors say that the letter by Mazers et al. provides further justification for their belief that technical problems in dual-photon absorptiometry need to be explored.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
