<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 461513
Using a series of 100 brain scintigrams, 50 with single 'mathematical tumours' superimposed, a comparison is made of several processing and display methods used at various institutions in the United Kingdom. The survey compares results from seven centres and includes most types of computer generated display in current use.
Brain Neoplasms, Humans, Image Enhancement, Radionuclide Imaging, Models, Biological, Mathematics
Brain Neoplasms, Humans, Image Enhancement, Radionuclide Imaging, Models, Biological, Mathematics
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |