
doi: 10.1086/jce201425303
pmid: 25192343
In response to Flamm and Kodish, I argue that our misunderstanding or disagreement is primarily the result of different definitions of power. I also disagree with them and claim that they are indeed using the public's ethics. Finally, I argue that there is no reason to think that bioethicists cannot have the same sort of influence in the boardroom that they have in the clinic.
Ethics, Moral Obligations, Conflict of Interest, History and Philosophy Of Specific Fields, Institutional, Philosophy, Clinical, Ethics, Clinical, Ethicists, Ethics Consultation, Humans, Ethics, Institutional, Applied Ethics, Applied ethics, Delivery of Health Care, Philosophy and Religious Studies
Ethics, Moral Obligations, Conflict of Interest, History and Philosophy Of Specific Fields, Institutional, Philosophy, Clinical, Ethics, Clinical, Ethicists, Ethics Consultation, Humans, Ethics, Institutional, Applied Ethics, Applied ethics, Delivery of Health Care, Philosophy and Religious Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
