Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Heterodichogamy in Ascarina lucida (Chloranthaceae)

Authors: Garnock-Jones, Philip; Malcolm, SB; Jesson, LK;

Heterodichogamy in Ascarina lucida (Chloranthaceae)

Abstract

Premise of research. Among early-divergent angiosperms, Ascarina is an important genus whose sexual system, inflorescences, and flowers have been inconsistently interpreted. While both monoecy and dioecy have been reported in the genus, our observations show that Ascarina lucida is monoecious and wind pollinated and its dimorphic inflorescence morphology is linked with dimorphism in type of dichogamy. Methodology. We studied a wild population of the New Zealand tree A. lucida. We recorded anthesis of male and female flowers on 30 plants each week throughout its 20-wk flowering period (late June to early November). We also estimated flowering gender among plants. Pivotal results. Ascarina lucida populations are monomorphic for gender but dimorphic for both cymule structure and type of dichogamy. Furthermore, the morphs are linked, such that plants with one cymule type are protandrous and plants of the other cymule type are protogynous. Our samples were statistically consistent with an expected 1∶1 morph ratio. In a first flowering pulse (6–10 wk), one morph presented female flowers, while the other presented male flowers. In the second pulse (7–8 wk), the flower sexes presented by each morph were reversed. Protandrous plants had a gap of several weeks between flowering pulses, but the tails of the female and male phases overlapped by 3 wk in a few protogynous plants. Conclusions. We conclude that A. lucida is heterodichogamous. This is the first record of heterodichogamy in Chloranthaceae and in the New Zealand flora. Heterodichogamy explains previous reports of dioecy in A. lucida and might explain conflicting reports of sexual systems in other species. We discuss the potential for a pathway from heterodichogamy to dioecy in Ascarina.

Keywords

Plant biology, Biological sciences, Ecology, FOS: Biological sciences, Evolutionary biology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!