
doi: 10.1086/698198
pmid: 30016158
Sexual dimorphism is a substantial contributor to the diversity observed in nature, extending from elaborate traits to the expression level of individual genes. Sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic coevolution are thought to be central forces driving the dimorphism of the sexes and its diversity. We have substantial data to support this at the phenotypic level but much less at the genetic level, where distinguishing the role of conflict from other forms of sex-biased selection and from other processes is challenging. Here we discuss the powerful effects sexual conflict may have on genome evolution and critically evaluate the supporting evidence. Although there is much potential for sexual conflict to affect genome evolution, we have relatively little compelling evidence of a genomic signature of sexual conflict. A central obstacle is the mismatch between taxa in which we understand sexually antagonistic selection and those in which we understand genetics.
Sex Characteristics, Genome, Polymorphism, Genetic, Evolution, Genomics, sexually antagonistic selection, 1105 Ecology, Biological Coevolution, 1105 Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Behavior and Systematics, sexual conflict, genomics, Animals, Genetic Fitness, Selection, Genetic
Sex Characteristics, Genome, Polymorphism, Genetic, Evolution, Genomics, sexually antagonistic selection, 1105 Ecology, Biological Coevolution, 1105 Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Behavior and Systematics, sexual conflict, genomics, Animals, Genetic Fitness, Selection, Genetic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 100 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
