Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Infection Control an...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Article . 1992 . Peer-reviewed
License: Cambridge Core User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Continuous Quality Improvement

Authors: M D, Decker;

Continuous Quality Improvement

Abstract

heard the cannonk report or seen the handbills announcing the new order.." The Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) announced its Agenda for Change in 1986, and has stated that the "philosophical context" for the Agenda for Change is set by the theories of Continual Quality Improvement (CQI).1 During the past six years, the JCAHO has convened a number of expert panels to develop the necessary tools to systematically review and revise the standards by which hospitals are accredited, and to develop methods for the implementation of CQI in hospitals. Many of these efforts are expected to be reflected in the 1994 Accreditation Manual for Hospitals, to be published in less than two years. What is CQI, and why is it being promoted? For many years, efforts to assure the quality of hospital care depended on simple, predominantly structural standards that gauged whether hospitals were organized in such a way that quality care could be provided. The second era, incorporating the 1970s and 1980s, has been marked by the enumeration of complex standards by the government, insurers, and others. When these procedural standards were met, care was considered to be of acceptable quality and no further action was indicated. When a standard was not met, the response often was to seek a miscreant who could be punished for the transgression. Attention was directed almost exclusively to the performance of physicians, with little recognition given to the roles of other participants in the process or to the organization of the process itself. The definitions of quality rarely encompassed such considerations as patient satisfaction or the needs of families, employers, or other healthcare providers. An alternative approach to attaining quality has achieved widespread use and acceptance over the past 50 years, although it remains unknown to most healthcare workers. This alternative approach is often referred to as continuous quality improvement, total quality management, total quality control, or industrial quality control.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Time Factors, Hospital Administration, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Process Assessment, Health Care, Humans, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    18
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
18
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!