
doi: 10.1086/646251
pmid: 1787311
Tests may provide valuable information for identification or prediction functions. Examples include disease diagnosis and staging, therapeutic outcome prediction, outbreak detection, infection control policy compliance monitoring, and other quality assurance monitoring. However, the importance of information from specific tests depends on their validity and utility Thus, hospital epidemiologists who assess new or existing tests themselves should bear in mind “…a clear need for greater attention to accepted methodological standards on the part of researchers, reviewers and editors.”’ Poorly validated tests can produce harmful, misleading results.
British Columbia, Predictive Value of Tests, Diagnosis, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity
British Columbia, Predictive Value of Tests, Diagnosis, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
