
arXiv: astro-ph/0505504
Swift/UVOT has the capability to provide critical insight into the physics of the early afterglows of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). But without precise calibration of the UVOT to standard photometric systems, it is impossible to leverage late- time, ground-based follow-up data to the early-time UVOT observations. In this paper, we present a calibration of the Swift/UVOT photometry to the standard Johnson UBV system for the UVOT UBV filters,and a step-by-step photometry recipe for analyzing these data. We base our analysis on aperture photometry performed on the ground-based and UVOT observations of the local standard stars in the fields of supernovae (SNe) 2005am and 2005cf, and a number of Landolt standard stars.We find that the optimal photometry aperture radius for UVOT data is small (2".5 for unbinned data,3".0 for 2X2 binned data),and show that the coincidence- loss (C-loss) correction is important even for relatively faint magnitudes (mag 16 to 19). Based on a theoretically motivated model,we fit the C-loss correction with two parameters, the photometric zero point (ZP) and the saturation magnitude (m_inf), and derive tight constraints for both parameters [sigma(ZP) = 0.01 mag and sigma(m_inf) = 0.02 mag)].We find that the color term correction is not necessary for the UVOT B and V filters,but is necessary for the U filter for blue objects [(U - V) < 0.4 mag]. We also apply our calibration results to the UVOT observations of GRB 050603. There is a scatter of ~0.04--0.08 mag in our final UVOT photometry, the cause of which is unclear, but may be partly due to the spatial variation in the pixel sensitivity of the UVOT detector.
Accepted for publication in PASP (2006 Jan issue). Significantly improved version with many more standard stars. A high resolution version can be found at http://astron.berkeley.edu/~weidong/uvot_calib.ps.gz
QC Physics, Astrophysics (astro-ph), QB Astronomy, FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics, QC, QB
QC Physics, Astrophysics (astro-ph), QB Astronomy, FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics, QC, QB
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 43 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
