
doi: 10.1086/467379
A manufacturer distributes output before knowing demand and thus risks making more than its rivalrous independent retailers can sell at the monopoly price. If demand is low, retailers may therefore resell more than the joint profit‐maximizing output. Anticipating this, they will not pay as much for the merchandise ex ante as they would if the manufacturer could commit to preventing rivalry. The manufacturer has many options, including vertical integration, chain outlets, restricted output, buy backs, just‐in‐time deliveries, and minimum resale prices. The article discusses each option's advantages and disadvantages and concludes that all roads lead to resale price maintenance. The article closes with an alternative to the dealercartel hypothesis for minimum resale prices.
Law
Law
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
