
doi: 10.1086/467111
handle: 10419/262436
nothing to about 25 percent in only a couple of decades. Chains had become particularly important in the grocery business, where by 1929 they accounted for almost 40 percent of retail grocery sales.1 In an earlier article in this Journal I discussed, in some detail, the struggles between independent retailers and the chains of this period.2 There my main concern was with how these struggles produced the Robinson-Patman Act of 1936. Here I want to focus on the chain tax movement that began a number of years earlier. This paper studies the cross-sectional pattern of these taxes in order to answer two specific questions. First, why did some states pass chain taxes while others did not? Second, did these taxes have any real effect on chain growth? To answer the first question I test a simple model based on the economic theory of regulation. This may seem like a somewhat ambitious
ddc:330, Law
ddc:330, Law
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
