Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ The Journal of Law a...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
The Journal of Law and Economics
Article
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: UnpayWall
The Journal of Law and Economics
Article . 1979 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

The Origin of Compulsory Drug Prescriptions

Authors: Temin, Peter;

The Origin of Compulsory Drug Prescriptions

Abstract

BEFORE 1938, the only drugs for which prescriptions were needed were certain narcotics specified in the Harrison Anti-Narcotics Act of 1914.1 Any other drug could be obtained by walking into a pharmacy and buying it. If a person wished to see a doctor and get a prescription, he could. But any nonnarcotic drug he could buy with a prescription could also be bought without one, and any prescription could be used as many different times and for as many different people as desired. This state of affairs ended in 1938 when two different categories of nonnarcotic drugs-prescription and over-the-counter-were created. Although the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act was passed in 1938, this distinction was not spelled out in that law. In fact, it seems clear that the legislative intent of that law was violated by this distinction. This paper recounts the story of how a new category of nonnarcotic prescription drugs was created in 1938 and how it was finally written into law in 1951. The story is told in three parts. The first part recounts the organizational and legislative history of the 1938 law. The second part shows how the Federal Drug Administration's regulations extended the law to create the distinction between prescription and over-the-counter drugs. The third part describes the subsequent history of this regulation in the Supreme Court and Congress. A final section summarizes the argument.

Country
United States
Related Organizations
Keywords

History, Modern 1601-, Law, Legislation, Pharmacy, United States

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    28
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
28
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
hybrid
Related to Research communities